|
Hi,
I would like to ask whether wicket keeps version of pages when changes are made with ajax requests. If it does, it seems as a waste of resources, unless ajax back button support is implemented (with javascript history, etc). Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
|
That's funny, I was just really hoping for a way to do the exact opposite
so that the back button works correctly. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Nazaret Kazarian <[hidden email] > wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to ask whether wicket keeps version of pages when changes > are made with ajax requests. > > If it does, it seems as a waste of resources, unless ajax back button > support is implemented (with javascript history, etc). > > Thanks. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] > > |
|
Well, as far as I know, since Wicket does not yet support browser back
button with ajax (only some experimental extensions exist), keeping track of the history does not make any sense right? 2011/12/7 Adam Gray <[hidden email]>: > That's funny, I was just really hoping for a way to do the exact opposite > so that the back button works correctly. > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Nazaret Kazarian <[hidden email] >> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to ask whether wicket keeps version of pages when changes >> are made with ajax requests. >> >> If it does, it seems as a waste of resources, unless ajax back button >> support is implemented (with javascript history, etc). >> >> Thanks. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Nazaret Kazarian
no. we do not keep versions for ajax requests. we will, when the back
button is supported. -igor On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Nazaret Kazarian <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to ask whether wicket keeps version of pages when changes > are made with ajax requests. > > If it does, it seems as a waste of resources, unless ajax back button > support is implemented (with javascript history, etc). > > Thanks. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
|
Thanks Igor for confirming.
2011/12/7 Igor Vaynberg <[hidden email]>: > no. we do not keep versions for ajax requests. we will, when the back > button is supported. > > -igor > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Nazaret Kazarian > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to ask whether wicket keeps version of pages when changes >> are made with ajax requests. >> >> If it does, it seems as a waste of resources, unless ajax back button >> support is implemented (with javascript history, etc). >> >> Thanks. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
